The power bank has a prolonged battery life. Syska mobile accessories offer a wide range of top quality products such as wireless speakers, wireless headsets, earphones, car chargers and others. The power bank comes in Portable Nebulizer Manufacturers red, blue and silver colours.High Density Polymer Cell - Syska Power Bank has a steady protection with a 5000 mAh cell, with multi-protection circuit which provides prolonged battery life and an advanced mechanism of discharging protection for overcharging. The power bank is light in weight and can be easily carried along during travel. The product is compatible with a wide range of devices including Digital Cameras, Gaming Consoles, iPods, Mp3/Mp4 players, Tablets, Bluetooth Speakers, Headphones, Android or iPhones. Built with intelligent multi-protection circuit, the power bank ensures safe charging while protectecting itself from overcharge.

Advanced current shunt with fast charging – Syska P0511J Power Bank can shunt its current which allows the power bank to self-charge and protects your battery from critical damage such as excessive heating or reduced battery backups.Syska Accessories has launched the P0511J Power Bank..Overcharge and discharge protection - This gadget qualifies its “Overcharge and Discharge Protection” function in case the power is not switched off after completion of charge in the device. In this innovative era, Syska introduces a highly conventional technology that saves time and offers maximum benefits. Syska powerbank is multifunctional, pocket fit sleek and is available at leading retail outlets for Rs 1,199.Intelligent multi-protection circuit- Syska Power Bank has assembled intelligent circuit to provide a constant stream of current to ensure safe charging. The product comes in various colours.

The powerbank comes with a steady capacity of 5000mAh and high energy density polymer cell. Power banks work as an inexpensive alternative for most instead of replacing the smartphone battery. The warranty will be effective from the date of purchase of the product.6 Months Warranty – P0511J comes with a 6 months’ warranty against any manufacturing defects.The power bank market is on a growth trajectory owing to factors such as increasing uغير مجاز مي باشدe of electronic devices and technological advancements.Features of the Syska P0511J Power Bank:Pocket size – Syska P0511J Power Bank is super lightweight and weighs about 110 gm and is compact in size.Plug and play led battery indicator - Syska Power Bank now indicates its plug-in power through Led indicator for better knowledge of battery statics.Multiple Compatible and Travel Friendly – The power bank comes with multiple connectors like One Micro USB for input and output (DC 5V/2A). The metal bodied power bank comes with a Micro USB input and USB output port that allows you to charge your device rapidly. It also instantly disables the output when it exceeds the rated current to protect the circuit’s safety

Oracle argued during the 2016 trial that Google copied Java because it was desperate to enter the smartphone market and that internal emails showed company representatives believed they needed to pay for a license.Following a deadlocked jury verdict in 2012, a federal judge in San Francisco sided with Google and said the APIs were not copyrightable.The jury sided with Google, denying Oracle’s bid for about billion in damages.Google has said copyright protection should not extend to APIs because they are essential tools for creating software.”.Google has also argued that its copying of them is permissible under the fair-use defense, which allows unlicensed use of copyrighted works for purposes such as research.Oracle general counsel Dorian Daley said in a statement that Google is rehashing arguments that have already been discredited.

Oracle is seeking royalties for Google’s unauthorized use of portions of the Java language known as application programming interfaces (APIs), which are tools that allow different computer programs to talk to each other.The litigation involves how much copyright protection should extend to Oracle’s Java programming language, which Google used to design the Android operating system that runs most of the world’s smartphones.The litigation has already produced several reversals of fortune.The Federal Circuit said in its 2018 decision that Google could not invoke the fair use defense because it copied the Java APIs verbatim and “for an identical function and purpose.Google said the Federal Circuit’s ruling in favor of Oracle was a “devastating one-two punch at the software industry” that would chill innovation.

Google urged the high court to rule its copying of Oracle’s Java programming language to create the Android operating system was permissible under US copyright law.Alphabet Inc’s Google on Thursday asked the US Supreme Court to reverse a ruling that resurrected a billion-dollar copyright case brought by Oracle Corp that dates to 2010.“The fabricated concern about innovation hides Google’s true concern: that it be allowed the unfettered ability to copy the original and valuable work of others for substantial financial gain,” Daley said.Google countered that the APIs were written for personal computers and it transformed them for use in smartphones in a manner that caused no economic harm to Oracle.The Federal Circuit diغير مجاز مي باشدreed in 2014, leading to a second jury trial in 2016 on whether Google was shielded by the fair use defense.A Custom Portable Nebulizer Manufacturers jury cleared Google in 2016, but the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed that verdict in March 2018 and set the stage for a jury trial to determine monetary damages

Facebook’s USD 5 billion payout still requires US Department of Justice approval. You can’t change your face.The FTC probe arose from the discovery that Facebook had let British consulting firm Cambridge Analytica harvest users’ personal information. “It’s not like a Social security card or credit card number where you can change the number.Writing for China Medical Device Manufacturers the appeals court, Circuit Judge Sandra Ikuta said the Illinois users could sue as a group, rejecting Facebook’s argument their claims were unique and required individual lawsuits.A federal appeals court on Thursday rejected Facebook Inc’s FB.It came as the social media company faces broad criticism from lawmakers and regulators over its privacy practices.

The lawsuit began in 2015, when Illinois users accused Facebook of violating that state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act by using facial recognition technology to collect biometric data. 18-15982.“This biometric data is so sensitive that if it is compromised, there is simply no recourse,” Shawn Williams, a lawyer for plaintiffs in the class action, said in an interview..Federal court procedures allowed the plaintiffs to sue Facebook in California though they called Illinois home.The case is Patel et al v Facebook Inc, 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals, No. Last month, Facebook agreed to pay a record USD 5 billion fine to settle a Federal Trade Commission data privacy probe.Williams, a partner at Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, said the class could include 7 million Facebook users.O effort to undo a class action lawsuit claiming that it illegally collected and stored biometric data for millions of users without their consent.

Facebook allegedly accomplished this through its “Tag Suggestions” feature, which allowed users to recognize their Facebook friends from previously uploaded photos.”Facebook did not immediately respond to requests for comment.The 3-0 decision from the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco exposes Facebook to billions of dollars in potential damages to the Illinois users who brought the case.Illinois’ biometric privacy law provides for damages of USD 1,000 for each negligent violation and USD 5,000 for each intentional or reckless violation.She also said the 2008 Illinois law was intended to protect individuals’ “concrete interests in privacy,” and that Facebook’s alleged unauthorized use of a face template “invades an individual’s private affairs and concrete interests.”The appeals court returned the case to US District Judge James Donato in San Francisco, who had certified a class action in April 2018, for a possible trial unless Facebook successfully appeals